Ahhhhhh ..... now if the female orgasm, fun
If you still had any guilt when making love with your partner just to have fun, and to dilute ends. Dr. Elisabeth A. Lloyd, a philosopher of science and professor of biology at Indiana University, argued in his new book "The Case of the Female Orgasm: Bias in the Science of Evolution", that orgasm had no role in evolution.
As reported in today's edition of The New York Times, the man's orgasm is associated always to play for Darwin.Pero evolutionary theory, according to the article, the logic behind the female orgasm had not been so clear, since only women can get pregnant having sex, although these do not include an orgasm . So, if that perpetuate the species, the Darwinian question has always been: What is the evolutionary purpose of orgasm?
According to The New York Times, in the last four decades, scientists have tried different arguments to answer this question. One of them, is that orgasm encourages women to have sex and, therefore, that leads to or choose to play stronger and healthier men improving the chances of survival of the species humana.La Dr. Lloyd, however, claims in his book that the most convincing theory is that of Dr. Donald Symons, an anthropologist who said that female orgasms are simply artifacts, biological products of parallel development of male and female embryos between weeks eight and nine of gestation. According to Lloyd, in that period, the passage of nerves and tissues are set aside for various reflexes, including the orgasm, but as it develops further, hormones fill male embryo and defines the sexualidad.Entonces, is the expert, is when you develop the penis in males and the potential to have orgasms and ejaculate, while women are the nerves to orgasm, although initially had the cuerpo.La same plan for Dr. Lloyd, according to The New York Times, no room for doubt: the female orgasm "is for fun."
Oh God! Biology teaches you more and more things ... and this I will tell my students when biology teacher??
0 comments:
Post a Comment